Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 4,619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2010, 5:20 am
Section 7-1-102) 5. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:25 am
34–41). [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:49 am
Smith [Continued from yesterday's Part 1.] [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Perry, 83 Ohio St. 3d 41, 697 N.E.2d 624 (Ohio Supreme Court 1998)). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:09 am
Thus, inasmuch as plaintiff's complaint does not state any cognizable claim in law or in equity, it must be dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) (see Heffez, 56 AD3d at 526; Simmons, 32 AD3d at 465). [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:07 pm
However, between 2:41 p.m. and 2:44 p.m., HFTs aggressively sold about 2,000 E-Mini contracts in order to reduce their temporary long positions. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
Germany (2005) 40 EHRR 1. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 3:21 am
Real Estate contracts are signed in 2009 A clause states that the deposits may be reclaimed (returned to buyers) if the first closing does not take place by September 2008. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:44 pm
.), with id. at 37-41 (Tatel, J., concurring) (concluding that such standards do exist). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
” IB at 1. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
That number is 41, as in 41 degrees Fahrenheit. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
Definitions IN THIS CHAPTER, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES: 1. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am
After first noting that the question lies at the intersection of 1) Separation of Powers and 2) Who has power over Executive Branch officials, and the extent of that power. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
The international legal community recognizes the same sources of international law as does the United States’ legal system. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:17 pm
41. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
41 J. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 9:14 am
This was in response to discussions with federal transportation officials who project cost overruns in the amount of $1 billion. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Pennsylvania precedent does not support the public nuisance claim plaintiffs advance here, and we cannot predict that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will choose to expand state public nuisance law in the manner plaintiffs urge.Id. at 421 (citations to Lead Industries, Leo, and Camden omitted)In Sheridan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 11:52 am
In what follows, I explain the decision and its significance by addressing the following issues: 1) the parties and their arguments, 2) the court’s statutory analysis 3), the court’s constitutional analysis, and 4) what happens next. 1) The Parties and their Arguments The government is the only traditional party in the case. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Well, eliminating that kind of mutual ignorance is one of the things that this blog’s all about, so we thought we’d take a look at how §2 of the Third Restatement is faring these days.We see three important issues wrapped up in the Third Restatement – these being, (1) risk/utility balancing as the basic means of assessing liability, (2) the requirement of a feasible alternative design, and (3) employment of negligence-based “reasonableness" as the test. [read post]
