Search for: "Does 1-75" Results 3741 - 3760 of 4,859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2011, 4:50 am
Sawyer sued Onondaga County, contending that the county had retaliated against them for “whistle blowing” in violation of (1) their Constitutional right to free speech and (2) Section 75-b of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:23 pm
 ISBN 978-1-84592-452-2. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:27 am by Law Office of D. Hardison Wood
 If passed, this bill (note: this is v.1, we are actually onto v.6 now) will impact you on a daily basis. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
Public policy does not nullify the choice she made (cf., Matter of Abramovich v Board of Educ., 46 NY2d 450, cert denied 444 US 845). [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 2:31 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 10 provides for the provisional arrest and detention of a fugitive for no more than 75 days pending receipt by the executive authority of the requested State of a fully documented extradition request in conformity with Article 7. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:41 pm by LindaMBeale
Claims to "create nearly 1 million new private -sector jobs next year" and 2.5 million in 10 years from now; to "spur economic growth", and to "unleash prosperity and economic security" with "higher wages" and more income per family note that this disregards the fact that it will result in the loss [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:45 am by Mike
 Does it matter that I have a full hamper of laundry? [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 8:52 am by GuestPost
The Manifesto asks the parties to commit to the following: 1. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
The decision does not lay open the expert witness to an action for damages by the former opposing party. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:00 pm
Although the plan calls for the most sweeping tax reform since 1986 it does not cut revenues. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:05 am by velvel
April 4, 2011Discursive Comments On The Oral Argument In The Court of Appeals In The Madoff Case On March 3, 2011.PART 5 Next up was Helen Chaitman for rebuttal. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:44 am by The Legal Blog
However, the said prohibition does not apply to the property of his parents. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:38 am by Daniel Shaviro
Now Astolphe pays $35,000 tax and gets $19,000 of spending, all within the “normal” structure.Example 3Same as Example 1, but now we add a welfare benefit equaling 75% of the amount (if any) by which one’s income falls short of $20,000. [read post]