Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 3741 - 3760 of 15,515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2009, 10:46 pm by Simon Gibbs
  The judge accepted that the success fee should be reduced to the 5% figure suggested in paragraph paragraph 24 of C v W [2008] EWCA Civ 1459.Who says that legal costs isn't exciting? [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 7:52 pm
 Related posts:  Euros and Scents: More on LVMH v. eBay, Strike 2: eBay loses to LVMH, Party Time,  Defendant du Jour [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 2:18 pm
Altair Engineering v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 7:41 am
How this happened I cannot quite figure out, but the defense lawyers should have gotten together on this. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am by INFORRM
” He cited four privacy cases – McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73; HRH Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] Ch 57; Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] QB 103; and Murray v Express Newspapers [2009] Ch 481 – where the House of Lords had refused to grant permission to appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm by Linda McClain
June 12th is Loving Day, a holiday celebrating the landmark case Loving v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:21 pm
  Again, we could figure this out before law school. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
With respect to the right of privacy, the government does not have a legitimate interest in protecting public figures, such as former President Trump, from speech that criticizes, ridicules, or even praises them. [read post]