Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 5,731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Knauff v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 9:48 am
This moggy has just finished reading his copy of Mr Justice Birss’s decision Accord Healthcare Limited v. medac Gesellschaft [2016] EWHC 24 (Pat). [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Holder, 133 S. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Holder, 133 S. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:07 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In Bell v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 3:38 am
In 2012 the court in Paris ruled that Alan Wofsy, had violated a previous order against making any commercial use of the photos, and ordered him to pay damages to the copyright-holder. [read post]
8 May 2022, 1:43 am
It will be interesting to see whether the rights-holders in the names HENRY and RONALDINHO, or in the badges of their respective football clubs, will file an opposition. [read post]
Will the United States survive the 2016 election (and 2017 Inauguration of Donald Trump)? Continuing
22 Feb 2017, 1:13 pm
Tomorrow I shall teach Prigg v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:43 am
This time it's the turn of Kerbal Space Program game aficionado Matt Lowne, who has come under fire from copyright holders for using what he was sure was a royalty-free track in his videos. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 1:07 pm
Freeman v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that test. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:45 am
The Supreme Court upheld Japanese internment in Korematsu v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:47 pm
SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1482 is a Court of Appeal, England and Wales, ruling from last week on an action that seems to have been going on for rather a long time -- which indeed it has. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am
But I think it is truly idiotic as an argument for a president in say, the first or second year of his/her term, unless we simply want to give up, as I fear that is increasingly the case, and accept the the notion, propagated by the DOJ, that the most important office holder in the land is unaccountable to any genuine legal or institutional constraints. [read post]
D&O Insurance: "Ambiguity" Whether Insured vs. Insured Exclusion Bars Coverage for FDIC's D&O Claims
7 Jan 2013, 11:58 pm
” Accordingly, he concluded that “the FDIC-R has show that some ambiguity exists in the insured versus insured exclusion,” and he denied the carrier’s motion for summary judgment in reliance on the exclusion. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
(citing Bowen v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
It follows that, subject to the exceptions and limitations laid down exhaustively in Article 5 of the directive, any use of such protected subject matter by a third party without such prior consent must be regarded as infringing the holder’s rights (see, to that effect, judgments of 16 November 2016, Soulier and Doke, C‑301/15, EU:C:2016:878, paragraphs 33 and 34, and of 7 August 2018, Renckhoff, C‑161/17, EU:C:2018:634, paragraph 29 and the case-law cited). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:25 am
If the Court followed the interpretation of Article 8(2) as advanced by Constantin Film, it would upset “the balance that was struck by the EU legislature in such a way as to favour the interests of holders of intellectual property rights. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:12 am
BATISTE v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:12 pm
In Bell v Burson (402 U.S. 535) the Court acknowledged that the right to drive is a privilege. [read post]
