Search for: "Husband v. Wife"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 6,701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2013, 8:45 am
The Criminal Law Amendments suggested by the Justice Verma Committee are synopsised in a two-part guest post by Mrinal Satish and Shwetasree Majumder, who worked with the Committee. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 8:59 am
In Chandler, the husband and wife were divorced in the Circuit Court of Hanover County Virginia. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:00 am
We wrote about the Eric v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:40 pm
The defendants, a husband and wife, signed a contract with the plaintiff to list their residence for sale. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Alvarado, Justice DiDomenico rejected the Wife’s argument that the 2012 decision of the Third Department in Nizolek v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
Even since McCann v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
Even since McCann v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:50 pm
Rothfeld v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:00 am
Kirby, World’s Most Awesome Judge Edwards v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am
Mr L argued firstly that the judge below had failed to apply the test in Kennealy v Dunne [1977] 1 QBD 837 properly.The court is required to be satisfied that the premises are reasonably required, but on the authority of Kennealy v Dunne that reasonable requirement must be something more than a desire but less than a necessity. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:13 am
Mr L argued firstly that the judge below had failed to apply the test in Kennealy v Dunne [1977] 1 QBD 837 properly.The court is required to be satisfied that the premises are reasonably required, but on the authority of Kennealy v Dunne that reasonable requirement must be something more than a desire but less than a necessity. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 10:30 pm
In the April 2012 decision in Reber v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:39 pm
Until the wife made her motion, below, the husband had failed to submit a requested application and financial information to the bank. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:24 am
From Family Law Week: The Court of Appeal in Davies v Davies [2012] EWCA Civ 1641 has upheld an order awarding the wife of a hotel owner a lump sum of £2.2m. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
McCain v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:43 am
When the checks arrived at the company's post office box, Tamatha removed [them] and . . . gave them to her husband . . . [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In his January 7, 2013 decision in Gluck v. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Korem 2012 NSCA 124Family Law - Husband and wife – Actions between husband and wife – Practice – Settlements (incl. enforcement of) A Family Division judge issued an order on July 6, 2012, following a settlement conference with the parties (Ms. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
But the IRS denied the refund claim on the ground that Windsor is not a “spouse” within the meaning of DOMA Section 3, which provides that “[i]n determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, . . . the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife”; thus, Windsor could not be a “surviving spouse” within the meaning of the refund statute. [read post]
