Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 3741 - 3760
of 18,452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2014, 9:37 am
A Town Justice ran for re-election. [read post]
6 May 2009, 12:50 pm
(Mapp v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 6:58 am
Watson and City of Ontario v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:36 pm
If you're poor and not yet convicted, you may get the benefit of a Strickland v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 4:52 pm
Made even more exciting when it's about the law to be applied in the interpretation of a contract.Justice Crosky writes a nice little -- okay, at 44 pages, so, not-so-little -- opinion about what law one uses when you're interpreting a contract. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has issued a provisional full version of its 2014 Report, which covers the work of the Court of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal, and provides yummy information for IP aficionados. [read post]
5 May 2023, 8:47 am
We’re still working through the first wave of litigation testing Congress’ poor handiwork. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:26 pm
Last summer, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg called Gill v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 11:39 am
Alabama, over the sharp objections of Justices Sotomayor and Breyer. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
This lack of discussion re the “expressive” nature of a challenged work is not new. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:57 pm
Justice Stevens' majority opinion in Kelo v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 11:16 pm
In Ortiz v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am
Verner and Wisconsin v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:53 pm
(Re)Righting history: Deconstructing the Court's narrative of Hawai'i's past. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:53 pm
(Re)Righting history: Deconstructing the Court's narrative of Hawai'i's past. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 11:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) In Wednesday’s oral argument in Fernandez v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 6:42 am
.'"From Lyle Denniston's description of the oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Kim, Commentary on Burwell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:43 am
He does not say this, but Justice Thomas would presumably say that employers can recover fees if it wins any Title VII case, and if the Court doesn't like it, Congress can re-write the statute to confirm to the principles set forth in Christiansburg-Garment. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:50 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Burwell v. [read post]
