Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 3741 - 3760
of 13,663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2018, 10:17 pm
If we don’t do this,we’re going to continue to have judges who decide on their own who pays what,under what circumstances they pay it. **** * *[Representative] Turner: So, if you were to summarize what we’re doing withthis Bill, it pretty much is dealing with the issue of judicial discretion. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 12:06 pm
Like a website, that means you’re trusting their continued work and wellbeing. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
Pix credit HEREEthics has always been a term that is easy to pronounce, easier to segregate and narrow, and nearly impossible to produce easy answers. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 3:14 pm
It seems like a lifetime ago that someone tweeted Sedley’s law of Documents at me, suggesting they needed re-writing for the age of the e-bundle. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
Reproduced with permission from the HR Library. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Indeed, much of dating involves deception by omission and even some overt deception (e.g., exaggerating one’s accomplishments, coloring one’s hair, wearing makeup to look younger, wearing cologne). [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 4:20 pm
That unique individual may, of course, represent a device not a person, or it may be pseudonymous, and one certainly can (and often should) create both technical and contractual barriers to re-identification. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:50 pm
So if you’re interested in building high-speed, scalable IP-based networks in rural areas and maybe getting at least some federal funding in the process, listen up. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:12 pm
Registrants and applicants may propose and submit alternative practices (e.g., modifications to the recommended test methodology) to EPA for assessment. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 1:27 pm
Those requirements vary with medical risk: high-risk devices (e.g., artificial heart valves) are subject to a rigorous premarket approval requirement; moderate-risk devices (e.g., N95s with antiviral agents) only need a 510(k) premarket notification to show “substantial equivalence” to an existing device, and low-risk devices (e.g., tongue depressors) are exempt from 510(k) requirements.As we have previously written, the FDA has relaxed regulatory burdens to… [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 6:53 am
With the statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant re-filed the claims of the sole request underlying the decision under appeal as a main request and filed the claims of first to third auxiliary requests.IV. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
See, e.g., Kratt v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 1:00 pm
Perhaps the most significant new burden: international traffic and revenue reporting requirements will be imposed on interconnected VoIP services (e.g., Vonage) and one-way VoIP services (e.g., Skype) which provide for international calling to the PSTN. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:50 pm
We’re pleased to be able to provide a glimpse into what was a spectacularly productive two days with the series of posts to come. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 6:38 pm
On that basis, normatively infused judgments can be attached to the measures (e.g. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 11:43 am
One typically has only a fairly limited ability to re-time it. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 2:59 pm
At the same time, the report operates under an odd pretense that these low-level drug offenders are themselves a serious safety threat, implying maybe they shouldn't be released pretrial:Even more important to public safety are cases in which defendants pose a serious risk of re-offending but are released on personal recognizance (PR) bonds after 90 days because lab results are still pending and judges refuse to continue to hold the defendants. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:13 am
Suppose we point the figure at culture – e.g., positing that something about U.S. and U.K. culture make us prime hosts both for income inequality and for social gradient ills (e.g., from having highly competitive cultures). [read post]
8 May 2016, 7:01 am
” (emphasis supplied)This is particularly interesting because earlier Benches of the Supreme Court have held that substantive due process and due process generally are a part of Indian constitutional law and are part and parcel of Article 21 of the Constitution [see: e.g., Re: Ramlila Maidan Incident, (2012) 5 SCC 1 (Para 43); Selvi v. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 5:53 pm
Fully re-occupying Gaza would exact an enormous cost for Palestinians and Israelis. [read post]
