Search for: "LEE v STATE" Results 3741 - 3760 of 5,095
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2011, 4:06 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AAO v Entry Clearance Officer [2011] EWCA Civ 840 (22 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Jackson v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1870 (22 July 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office v Johnson [2011] EWHC 1950 (Admin) (25 July 2011) Secretary of State for the Home Department v CB & Anor (Rev 1) [2011] EWHC 1990 (Admin) (25 July 2011) Britannia Assets (UK) Ltd v… [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:31 am by Howard Wasserman
In reversing that decision, McPhail made an intentionalist "spirit v. letter of the rule" decision. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:33 am by Howard Wasserman
In reversing that decision, McPhail made an intentionalist "spirit v. letter of the rule" decision. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:21 pm by Steve DiJulio
By Lee Marchisio with Steve DiJulio On June 7, 2011, the Washington Court of Appeals remanded (for a second time) Zink v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:19 am by admin
Some federal courts, however, have interpreted the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Branzburg v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:17 am by Anthony Lake
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and other courts have held, "when a mistrial is declared with the consent of the defendant or upon his motion, it is 'ordinarily assumed to remove any barrier to reprosecution, even if the defendant's motion is necessitated by prosecutorial or judicial error.'” Lee-Thomas v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:29 pm by scanner1
 For example, the Montana Supreme Court weighed in on Montana Criminal Jury Instruction 1-121 early this year in State v Norquay, 2011 MT 24, 359 Mont. 257, 248 P 3d 817, http://applicationengine.mt.gov/getContent? [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:53 am by Conor McEvily
The editorial board at USA Today discusses next Term’s United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am by William McGrath
In April 2010, the Government filed a superseding Indictment in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am by William McGrath
In April 2010, the Government filed a superseding Indictment in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:35 am by Viking
Another collateral consequences note, from United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:18 am by sally
Supreme Court NML Capital Ltd v Argentina [2011] UKSC 31 (6 July 2011) McDonald, R (on the application of) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2011] UKSC 33 (6 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Dalton v Nottinghamshire County Council [2011] EWCA Civ 776 (06 July 2011) AH v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 787 (06 July 2011) Howell & Ors v Lees- Millais & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 786 (06… [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm by Joe Bornstein
Lee, of Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog, points out that some of the film’s critics believe that the documentary "misrepresents the current state of America’s justice system by making it seem as if the average citizen now has drastically reduced access to courts. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:33 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Audio of NMCCA’s latest very interesting oral arugment in United States v. [read post]