Search for: "Line v. Line"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 45,527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2022, 6:05 am
The Prosecutor v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
As briefing nears its close, the battle lines are emerging in Moore v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 9:10 am
Study after study confirms that diversity in the workforce contributes to the bottom line. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 9:05 am
University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
Starting in 2004 with the decision in Sosa v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 5:30 am
In Grutter v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 2:40 am
Contents include: Naomi Egel & Steven Ward, Hierarchy, revisionism, and subordinate actors: The TPNW and the subversion of the nuclear order Marius Wishman & Charles Butcher, Beyond ethnicity: historical states and modern conflict Hoo Tiang Boon, International identity construction: China’s pursuit of the responsible power identity and the American Other Tobias Berger, Worldmaking from the margins: interactions between domestic and international ordering in mid-20th-century India… [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 3:00 pm
As Justice Samuel Alito commented in Fisher v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm
Winter v NRDL (2008) is the leading case for requirements for preliminary injunctive relief. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am
However, the precise definition of obscenity was unclear, and the Supreme Court would not rule that obscenity was not constitutionally protected speech until Roth v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
All in 280 pages (and one line drawing).Fleming’s defense proceeds in four parts. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:21 am
” XY, LLC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito yesterday called the leak of his draft opinion overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:21 am
” Here is the complaint: Depp v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
In Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 12:00 am
This position is in line with previous case law that in vitro data may support a claimed therapeutic effect (IPKat). [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Roe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 5:19 pm
The case, Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. [read post]
