Search for: "London v. State" Results 3741 - 3760 of 4,150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2009, 4:03 pm
City of New London and Post-Kelo eminent domain reform at Michigan State University Law School in Room 340. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:54 pm
Orr, Immigration Programme Manager at the High Commission of Canada in London, U.K., dated March 20, 2009. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:50 pm
Orr, Immigration Programme Manager at the High Commission of Canada in London, U.K., dated March 20, 2009. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:02 am
Ohio Judge Rules Pre-emption Still Valid Defense -- Sometimes The American Lawyer Ohio federal Judge Solomon Olivier Jr. has ruled that one class of state law tort claims against drug makers is still pre-empted by federal law, even after the Supreme Court's Wyeth v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:27 am
  London, the poster child for Congestion Pricing, has exempted electric vehicles and naturally gas fueled trucks from the much-debated tax. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:47 am
It was known to the Respondent that the Appellant in fact lived in Forest Hill, London and not at Flat 3 (although she was the leasehold owner of the same). [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 5:42 am
My weekly podcast roundup of the top family law cases and news, and the best family law blog posts:The Week in Focus 7th March 2009Stories/posts referred to in this podcast:Wincott v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] EWCA Civ 113 - Family Law NewswatchMM, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lewisham [2009] EWHC 416 (Admin)Jobs plea to ex-social workers - BBC NewsJack Straw deplores 'astonishing growth' of legal aid - The… [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:01 am
On this day in ...... 1956, via a 1-sentence per curiam order in Board of Trustees v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am by Roshonda Scipio
AUTHOR Tushnet, Mark V., 1945- TITLE The constitution of the United States of America : a contextual analysis / Mark Tushnet. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
In relation to the provision of accommodation under the National Assistance Act 1948, my noble and learned friend, Baroness Hale of Richmond, then Hale LJ, said in R (Wahid) v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2002] EWCA Civ 287 [2003] HLR 13, para 33, "[n]eed is a relative concept, which trained and experienced social workers are much better equipped to assess than are lawyers and courts, provided that they act rationally". [read post]