Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 4,048
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2009, 2:50 pm
In today’s case (Wong v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:59 am
AS (Somalia) (FC) and another (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2009] UKHL 32 (17 June 2009) Gray (Original Respondent and Cross appellants) v Thames Trains and others (Original Appellant and Cross respondents) [2009] UKHL 33 (17 June 2009) Attorney-General’s Reference No. 3 of 1999: Application by the British Broadcasting corporation to set [...] [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:25 am
Ancon Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:40 am
Lawcast 141: The House of Lords judgment on control orders Today I am talking to Carl Gardner, ex government lawyer and author of the Head of Legal blog about the House of Lords judgment in Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v AF (Appellant) (FC) and another (Appellant) and one other action Lord [...] [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:55 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) v AF (Appellant) (FC) and another (Appellant) and one other action [2009] UKHL 28 (10 June 2009) Hanoman (FC) (Respondent) v London Borough of Southwark (Appellants) [2009] UKHL 29 (10 June 2009) R v Islam (Respondent) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) [2009] UKHL 30 [...] [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:41 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3); Same v AN; Same v AE House of Lords “Where, in the interests of national security, the Secretary of State for the Home Department wanted to rely on closed material in a terror-suspect hearing to justify his decision to make a control order, the controlled person [...] [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 3:30 am
(I will leave aside the problem created by the Schoon v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am
Lord Justice Aiken, agreeing that the appeal should be dismissed stated ” As Waller LJ has stated, S owed the appellant a duty of care. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
"Clear enough.But then the Supreme Court held in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
McConkey and another (Appellants) v The Simon Community (Respondents) (Northern Ireland) [2009] UKHL 24 (20 May 2009) Odelola (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2009] UKHL 25 (20 May 2009) R (on the application of G) (FC) (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondents) [2009] UKHL 26 (20 May 2009) Smith (Appellant) v [...] [read post]
31 May 2009, 11:17 pm
Liu Guijin, China’s special envoy to Darfur, is currently in Doha meeting with representatives from Britain, France, Russia, United States and the European Union in a 5-day conference on how to deal with the situation in western Sudan. [read post]
31 May 2009, 8:18 pm
Liu Guijin, China’s special envoy to Darfur, is currently in Doha meeting with representatives from Britain, France, Russia, United States and the European Union in a 5-day conference on how to deal with the situation in western Sudan. [read post]
31 May 2009, 10:24 am
On apparent bias, the Court noted that the website for HRL stated: We have dealt with over 3,500 reviews with unparallel [sic] success. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
In Kay, Lord Brown expressly stated that Connors could been argued as an “unfairness” challenge in the domestic courts and in Doherty, Lord Hope makes clear that the challenges are not confined to Wednesbury grounds. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:46 am
State, 643 S.W.2d 709, 718 (Tex. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:41 am
In Nicaragua v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:52 pm
The law is bitterly resented by many federal judges precisely because it was enacted to curtail their ability to lord it over state courts and because it rejected the notion that their judgments are inherently superior. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:02 am
In Lord Osunfarian Xodus v. [read post]
