Search for: "Matter of Edwards" Results 3741 - 3760 of 4,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2010, 7:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In infringement, strength of the mark matters, which requires assessement of distinctiveness. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 8:08 am by Phil Dixon
The court therefore vacated the defendant’s plea and sentence and remanded the matter for additional proceedings. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 1:59 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Karcher’s remark seems at least to indicate that the matter is less settled than I thought. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 10:10 am by Lawrence Solum
"  Perhaps, a jury can be reasonable, even though the trial judge knows the jury was wrong--if so, then the "reasonable jury" standard is not a matter of epistemic deference. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
Petitioner Edward Jerome Harbison was convicted of first-degree murder, second-degree burglary, and grand larceny, and was sentenced to death. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
"  Perhaps, a jury can be reasonable, even though the trial judge knows the jury was wrong--if so, then the "reasonable jury" standard is not a matter of epistemic deference. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:25 am by WSLL
Dodson, Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, Casper, WY for Edward & Janice King; and Steven F. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Well, Private Eye (No 1593) reports that by 21 February 2023, the Daily Mirror had run 232 pieces about the matter while The Sun had published 175 articles, and MailOnline 328 (that works out at more than 13 a day). [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:35 am by Kelly Buchanan
  An Infosheet about petitions on the Australian website similarly states: In the United Kingdom the right of petitioning the Crown and Parliament for redress of grievances dates back to the reign of King Edward I in the 13th century. [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm by Béligh Elbalti
In this respect, it is generally admitted that borderline should be that the enforcing court should refrain from reviewing the determination of facts and application of law made by the foreign court “as if it were an appellate tribunal reviewing how the “lower court” decided the case” (Peter Hay, Advance Introduction to Private International Law and Procedure (Edward Elgar, 2018) 121). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:42 am by Howard Knopf
In those March reasons, the Board said:In any event, the interim tariff we adopt in this matter is not mandatory. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 5:39 am
Kenneth Pritchard wrote to legal firm Skene Edwards advising them to withdraw from acting in the case, and that letter was subsequently discussed in the Scottish Parliament debate chamber by Cabinet Secretary for Business John Swinney. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:33 am by Susan Brenner
  The case began when, on the evening of December 31, 2010 and “into the early morning of January 1, 2011,” a New Year's Eve party was held at the Edwards Brothers Hall, also known as Knights of Columbus Hall, or just simply `the K,’ in Middletown, Ohio. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
On December 5, 2022, UW President Edward Seidel sent out an email message to the UW community regarding the tabling incident. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Defendant-Appellant James Edward Klups ("Klups") contests on appeal his sentence to a sixty-month prison term for travel with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 10:10 am by Lawrence Solum
"  Perhaps, a jury can be reasonable, even though the trial judge knows the jury was wrong--if so, then the "reasonable jury" standard is not a matter of epistemic deference. [read post]