Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 3741 - 3760
of 16,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2023, 6:37 am
You can't judge my national security. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 12:00 pm
Second, he doesn’t specify when the exchange occurred, other than to describe it as “some time ago. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:18 pm
Dan T. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 5:37 am
Earlier this week I suggested 10 reasons why you shouldn't date at work. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 2:01 pm
The Brain Injury Association continues to keep us apprised of legislative matters. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:37 am
David T Morrison and Co Limited t/a Gael Home Interiors v ICL Plastics Limited & Ors, heard7-9 April. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 4:37 am
The case doesn't necessarily stand for the proposition that sound marks aren't registrable, but that a registered visual mark isn't being "used" when salespeople just say the word. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:23 pm
") (quotation marks omitted); NXIVM Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 1:25 pm
Most of us don’t work for the government. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 11:31 am
The terminology doesn't matter for its own sake, but it is important to be clear about the meaning of the phrase when discussing path dependency. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 10:48 am
The terminology doesn't matter for its own sake, but it is important to be clear about the meaning of the phrase when discussing path dependency. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 6:30 am
Dayal's book doesn't do much to add to what I already knew about the album, and it doesn't really work as a pure appreciation either. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 4:43 am
The young lawyer will now be marked as someone who would lie to get a client, and I don't want him sitting next to me at trial. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:10 am
This ruling isn’t the end of the matter—TPW has simply been denied a preliminary injunction, meaning Yelp can continue using the mark while the parties continue to litigate. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 9:20 am
Point Five Development, LLC, 2013 VT 115By Andrew DelaneyThis decision is cold comfort indeed for the defendant: yes, the trial court got it wrong when it explicitly declined to consider potential defenses in the context of vacating a default judgment—but no matter because defendant didn’t make a compelling showing that it had a meritorious defense. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 3:15 pm
Mark Jones of the Baker Institute thinks outright legalization couldn't happen until at least 2023. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 5:01 am
But for sport, what most of us mean when we say "sex" is actually what matters, and that sex is undeniably binary: you either have testes and functional androgen receptors, or you don't. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:22 pm
" Clement, 131 F.3d at 1468 (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
30 May 2011, 10:27 am
’” I’m not sure that “good faith” should extend to require the defendant to act above reproach with respect to non-trademark matters, but it doesn’t matter here. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:53 am
They can then focus their outrage to something that truly matters: Halloween costumes. [read post]
