Search for: "Motion" Results 3741 - 3760 of 152,989
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2024, 6:54 am by Class Action Defense
District Court for the Northern District of Texas denied defendants’ motion to dismiss in a class action … Continue reading "Texas Federal Court Allows ERISA Class Action To Proceed Based On ESG Initiatives" [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 6:39 am by Kevin LaCroix
In a February 19, 2024, opinion, Vice Chancellor Lori Will granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss, holding that the plaintiffs’ complaint failed to establish demand futility. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Clark
Occupational Illness Workers’ Compensation covers both acute injuries that occur in the line of work as well as illnesses and health conditions sustained over time due to exposure to chemicals, certain environments, or repetitive motions. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 4:05 am by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Motion Glättli (18.3306): «Briefkasten» für Facebook & Co. zur Stärkung der Rechtsdurchsetzung Jetzt lesen! [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 8:46 pm by Scott Sternberg
The process for preparing this motion started months before a word of the motion was ever written. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm by John Floyd
  Pre-trial Motions   The defense may file motions to challenge the evidence, suppress illegally obtained information, or request dismissal of charges due to procedural irregularities. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
When, as here, a constitutional injury is "threatened and occurring at the time of respondents' motion," there is a risk of irreparable injury. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 1:52 pm
Quantitative Strategies Group, LLC (Application for bank execution to satisfy domesticated judgment against defendant; motion for exemption from execution pursuant to statute ((Supp. 2022) § 52-367b); claim that plaintiff judgment creditors executed on bank accounts that did not belong to defendant; § 52-367b; determination of interests pursuant to statute (§ 52-356c).) [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 1:43 pm by Class Action Defense
March 6, 2024), issued an order granting a motion to … Continue reading "New York Federal Court Grants Motion To Compel Arbitration Of Putative Class Action Unpaid Overtime Claims Based On Employee Handbook" [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 12:48 pm
Glasscock (Arbitration; motion to compel arbitration; motion to terminate automatic appellate stay; whether defendants' appeal was rendered moot by commencement of arbitration proceedings following trial court's order to commence arbitration proceedings.) [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 11:38 am
Zingaro & Cretella, LLC (Legal malpractice; motion for summary judgment; motion to reargue and reconsider; motion for judgment of nonsuit; accidental failure of suit statute (§ 52-592 (a)); claim that plaintiff's action was not time barred by applicable statute of limitations (§ 52-577) because action fell within purview of § 52-592.) [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 10:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Defendant opposed the motion and moved to unseal the case. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:12 am by Carina Novell
The plaintiff signed a pre-dispute employment contract that contained an arbitration clause, and the employer filed a motion to compel arbitration of the plaintiff’s claims. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:06 am by Eric S. Solotoff
” With her divorce complaint, the wife filed a motion to set aside the prenuptial agreement. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 8:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 This certainly couldn’t be assumed on a motion to dismiss. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 8:25 am by Legal Profession Prof
The Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of a motion to recuse This appeal arises out of a denial of a motion to recuse in a case in which the underlying litigation relates to alleged legal malpractice. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:50 am by Patricia Salkin
Although the court reversed the grant of the town’s motion for summary judgment, it held that the lower court properly denied the plaintiff’s cross-motion, since the plaintiff’s evidence did not eliminate all triable issues of fact regarding whether the road was a public highway and whether the town’s maintenance amounted to a taking by widening the road outside the minimum permitted width of a public highway as prescribed by the state highway law. [read post]