Search for: "Pass v. State" Results 3741 - 3760 of 28,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2019, 3:02 pm by Unknown
Hoopa Valley Tribe (Clean Water Act; Water Rights) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlUnited States of America v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 11:00 am by Native American Rights Fund
EPA (Clean Air Act, tribal power plants)    * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlSisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Three Minnesota corporations — one that promotes anti-abortion causes, one that supports low taxes and limited government, and a for-profit corporation in the travel business — contended that the state law, applicable only in state elections, is just like a federal law at issue in the January decision (Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:07 am
The Post covered this last week, right before the lawsuit (Council of the District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
A form of such relief was passed as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill which we have written about earlier. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:49 pm by Eric Muller
My friend and UNC emeritus colleague Gene Gressman passed away this afternoon at the age of ninety-two. [read post]
19 May 2015, 10:19 am by Mark Ashton
On April 29, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:39 am by Steve Hall
  This year marks the fifth legislative session in which Texas lawmakers have failed to pass legislation to establish procedures to memorialize Atkins v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 12:52 am
In any event it had not been shown that CCL deliberately intended to pass itself off as CCC [Merpel can't imagine why a private tertiary college should want to pass itself off as a state secondary school anyway] and there was insufficient evidence of any misrepresentation by CCL or confusion on the part of the relevant public (paras 62-63). [read post]