Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 3741 - 3760 of 6,179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2014, 3:07 pm
That change cannot be deduced solely from the subjective elements such as consumers' perceptions. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 8:14 pm by Mark Summerfield
  The one fortunate aspect of the case is that Australia is not one of those jurisdictions in which incorrect recording of inventorship or ownership is, in itself, fatal to the validity or enforceablity of a patent.In this case, the court has now ordered (Neobev Pty Ltd v Bacchus Distillery Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (No 4) [2014] FCA 21) that the Register of Patents be rectified to show Mr Scott as sole inventor. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 3:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  What kinds of things people react to as stealing v. legit borrowing matters.A: Moral facts: a prior Q. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:23 am
The recent overdose death of actor Philip Seymour Hoffman brings into sharper relief the issue decided by the Supreme Court last week in Burrage v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am by Eric Penzer
,quoting Lyons v Lyons, 187 AD2d 415, 416 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am by Eric Penzer
,quoting Lyons v Lyons, 187 AD2d 415, 416 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Finally, the fact that their preparation was incidental to a police surveillance operation does not make them inadmissible as was held in People v Guidice. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:18 am by Ben
 The production company, the sole copyright holder for Cold War on the Chinese mainland, pointed out that the film, which made 200 million yuan in the first 11 days of its release, was still playing in theaters at the time Tudou began showing it. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
”  As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:03 pm
 Justice Rubin says:  "Instead of pertinent case law to support her position, her appellant's brief relies solely on an eight-and-a-half page block quotation from a 15-year old law review article." [read post]