Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 4,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2009, 6:16 pm
The Criminal Division of the Department of Justice has instructed the prosecution to concede this issue on appeal. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
The Second District Court of Appeal has reversed Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael L. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Supreme Court* Federal Appellate Court Decisions* State Roundup* Topical* Articles/Reports/Books* Foreign SpotlightTo begin, scan the link descriptions below and click.U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 6:00 pm
Doe, supra, the Court of Appeals explained: Accordingly, though the question is novel in this State, it has been held, in circumstances such as here, that where by no fault on the parent's part, a child "voluntarily abandons the parent's home for the purpose of seeking its fortune in the world or to avoid parental discipline and restraint [the child] forfeits the claim to support" . . . [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
Guhl, Director Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES O.B., : : PETITIONER, : ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION : v [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 9:58 am
Nonetheless, I had to gasp for a second when I read the release associated with a Mercer County Superior Court judge's decision in State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:03 pm
The case was appealed to the New Jersey Appellate Division and that court upheld the findings of the lower court. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
So now we've got to deal with this grotesque chimera of product liability and misrepresentation set loose to lumber across the California landscape.Just about the only bright side (from our defense-minded perspective) of the whole Conte mess is that apparently a decision by one panel ("division") of the California Court of Appeal has next to no stare decisis effect on other divisions of the Court of Appeal, even within the same… [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:20 pm
Supreme Court's statement in State Farm v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:15 am
Alaska USA Federal Credit Union, Inc., Division I of the Washington Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s granting of summary judgment and ruled that genuine issues of material fact existed regarding Duncan’s breach of contract and wage claim statute claims. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:15 am
Alaska USA Federal Credit Union, Inc., Division I of the Washington Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s granting of summary judgment and ruled that genuine issues of material fact existed regarding Duncan’s breach of contract and wage claim statute claims. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:15 am
Alaska USA Federal Credit Union, Inc., Division I of the Washington Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s granting of summary judgment and ruled that genuine issues of material fact existed regarding Duncan’s breach of contract and wage claim statute claims. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 6:56 am
Thanks to Professor Patty Salkin's Law of the Land blog for letting us know that on January 14, 2009, the New York Court of Appeals (that state's highest court) will be hearing oral arguments in Aspen Creek Estates, Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 9:29 am
While I don’t like that outcome, I can’t blame the judge for being a bit confused about how these cases should be decided, considering the state of the past case law reviewed in this opinion (the match-head case in particular). [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 9:29 am
While I don’t like that outcome, I can’t blame the judge for being a bit confused about how these cases should be decided, considering the state of the past case law reviewed in this opinion (the match-head case in particular). [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 11:28 pm
Certainly not Division Three of the Fourth District Court of Appeal. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 6:05 pm
Of further note, the appellate counsel on both sides of this appeal were highly qualified, so I assume that they provided the Court of Appeal with high-quality policy arguments in a case of first impression where even suggestive authority is sparse. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit limited recovery to the attorney's cost. 472 F. 3d 1370 (2006). [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 4:10 pm
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 5:51 pm
Division II Davenport v. [read post]
