Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 3741 - 3760 of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2012, 9:45 am by Jess Bravin
Chief Justice John Roberts cited that assurance in his opinion for the court, Nken v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 7:33 pm
The court held that the family could recover even though the victim had less than a 50-percent chance of survival when he first sought treatment. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm by Vanessa Kurzweil
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, combined a number of petitions for review of the EPA rules brought by industry groups and states. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At Yahoo News, Roger Parloff reports that the court’s decision whether to “wade into the inherently political quagmire of district mapping” in Gill v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 8:04 am by Daniel Schwartz
Connecticut Mental Health, Superior Court, judicial district of New Haven at New Haven, Docket No. 388542 (February 3, 1997) (Silbert, J.) (19 Conn. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 6:01 am by Samuel Bray
First, the court says a national injunction is the ordinary remedy under the APA. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
Condo owners lost on summary judgment in the District Court in Houston (case info here) and took their beef to the Court of Appeal, which affirmed. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 10:08 am by Thomas James
On Friday, March 24, 2023, a federal district court judge agreed, granting the publishers’ motion for summary judgment. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
Great case from the 9th District in State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:33 am by Anna Christensen
In response to readers’ questions, Eugene Volokh explains at the Volokh Conspiracy why United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm by Ron Miller
Finding that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim of NLRA preemption, a federal district court in Minnesota ruled in Greene v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
The court took judicial notice of the first court's ruling, and under the doctrine of collateral estoppel, found that Bookout had failed to prove causation as to all the defendants except the Railroad. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
On August 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York . . . granted Bernardin's motion to dismiss, holding that Sewell's claims were time-barred under the CFAA's and SCA's applicable two-year statutes of limitations. [read post]