Search for: "State v. Frank" Results 3741 - 3760 of 4,384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
There is a likelihood of confusion between the Marks BETPACK and BETDAQ and the registration of a confusingly similar mark is contrary to the provisions of Community Law prohibiting the registration of the Trade Mark in the State, particularly Council Regulations regarding the registration of trade marks. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  This process of judicial nullification culminated in Plessy v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
 Steven questioned whether there was a solution to this troublesome state of events. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:28 am by Jani Ihalainen
This writer is woefully behind the times in writing about this decision, but it does merit belated discussion and is a very important decision to keep in mind in relation to intermediaries.The case of Frank Peterson v Google LLC (along with another case; Elsevier v Cyando) concerns Nemo Studio, a company owned by Mr Peterson who is a music producer. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:28 am by Jani Ihalainen
This writer is woefully behind the times in writing about this decision, but it does merit belated discussion and is a very important decision to keep in mind in relation to intermediaries.The case of Frank Peterson v Google LLC (along with another case; Elsevier v Cyando) concerns Nemo Studio, a company owned by Mr Peterson who is a music producer. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:20 am
Appellant is admitted to practice law in New York, Florida, and Alaska, but is currently on inactive status in those states. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 12:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Although no appeal was taken from the order, there was a substantial showing on the motion to vacate that the mother had been, to say the least, less than frank with the court. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
The Commissioner was of the view that it is understandable that the artists were not frank as they wished to protect their privacy. [read post]