Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 3741 - 3760 of 7,201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2015, 7:08 am by LTA-Editor
Currently, this may be HBO’s best option for reducing the rate of piracy of its programs in the United States; the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently ruled that the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) does not have the authority to prosecute foreign websites that contain pirated content in ClearCorrect Operating, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:16 pm
Blog post-US Supreme Court Bankruptcy Watch: Readying for Stern v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Turning to defendant's conduct after he learned of the title defects, as stated in Logalbo v Plishkiii, Rubano & Baum, supra: While the issue of whether certain conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires a factual determination to be made by a jury . . , , a plaintiff will be entitled to summary judgment in a case where there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care, and… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Turning to defendant's conduct after he learned of the title defects, as stated in Logalbo v Plishkiii, Rubano & Baum, supra: While the issue of whether certain conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires a factual determination to be made by a jury . . , , a plaintiff will be entitled to summary judgment in a case where there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care, and… [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:51 am by skelly
(v) The availability of the value-added product or service must be based on documented objective evidence and offered in a manner that is not unfairly discriminatory. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Turning to defendant's conduct after he learned of the title defects, as stated in Logalbo v Plishkiii, Rubano & Baum, supra: While the issue of whether certain conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires a factual determination to be made by a jury . . , , a plaintiff will be entitled to summary judgment in a case where there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care, and… [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:55 am by Spencer Aronfeld
The trial court initially agreed with the family, by entering a judgement in their favor, but State Farm succeeded in getting the judge to rehear their argument and vacate the judgment based upon the newly-decided Florida Supreme Court case of State Farm v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:34 am by Big Tent Democrat
Article V, Section 3 of the Florida Constitution provides that: [The Supreme Court . . . m]ay issue writs of mandamus and quo warranto to state officers and state agencies. [read post]