Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 25,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2019, 5:27 pm
Paraphrasing the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:55 pm
Here is the abstract: Though diversity remains a compelling state interest, recent rulings like Ricci v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 6:12 pm
In light of State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 5:09 am
Trump v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:11 pm
Once Graham is properly understood in light of Panetti, along with the Court’s other precedents, the grounds for an unsettling conclusion take root: specifically, that the Eighth Amendment likely forbids state-imposed retributive punishment against minors. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:44 am
Reinan had been a nursing home defense lawyer until he saw the light. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:44 am
Sambuco turned the emergency lights on, signaling Bell to stop. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 8:54 pm
Justice Thomas asked whether that was so even in light of the Court's case law holding that the State's Attorney's office is executive in nature. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:12 am
First, it refuses to embrace the Perfect 10 v. ccBill conclusion that 230 preempts state IP claims, but it doesn't accept the alternative proposition (from the Project Playlist and Friendfinder cases) either. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:05 pm
In 1990, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Michigan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:05 pm
In 1990, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Michigan v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:09 am
Nowak v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:18 pm
The petition of the day is: Title: Dismuke v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:22 am
Update: American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees, Council 79 v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am
Ward LJ also drew support from the Supreme Court’s judgment in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
First, the PHA states that a “person” may commit the criminal offence or be liable for the civil wrong of harassment (sections 1, 2 and 3). [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
This article sheds light on the motives behind the Scott's suit for freedom and addresses questions that have long plagued scholars such as why Dred didn't sue sooner or escape to free territory. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision this week in State v. [read post]
