Search for: "State v. Peoples" Results 3741 - 3760 of 45,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
United States, No. 11-820 (Feb. 20, 2013).We've blogged about what I still believe to be the landmark decision of Padilla v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
Under this model, if representative bodies did a good job of representing the people, the courts would be unnecessary. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am by SHG
In a 4-3 decision covering a pair of cases, People v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:56 pm
In People v Buchanan [4th Dept 6/6/08] (here) the Fourth Department unanimously held that the use of a stun belt that is not visible to the jury is subject to the same judicial scrutiny as other forms of physical restraint that are visible. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:53 am by Jennifer Lynch
These searches are becoming increasingly common as a component of forensic genetic genealogy investigations, and EFF has long argued they violate people’s Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]