Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 7,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2013, 5:31 pm
Koontz v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Two years later, the Court followed this up in Pierce v. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 6:33 am
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution states, “No person … shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:02 am
<> Pebble LP v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:23 am
Every coastal state, regardless of the actual presence of a geological continental shelf, is entitled to a legal continental shelf of up to 200 nautical miles, the maximum breadth of the EEZ as defined in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:39 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 121 S. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, 16-833, which the court denied, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am
The district court and First Circuit disagreed, citing United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
United Grain Growers Ltd., the Supreme Court of Canada stated, 91 The contract of employment has many characteristics that set it apart from the ordinary commercial contract. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Indeed, the Supreme Court of Canada recently delivered its decision in Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 401 that found the Alberta Personal Information Protection Act to be constitutionally invalid. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
, Lucas v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
August 25, 2023 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in FTC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
Sea Star Line, LLC, 06-606 QP: "Whether the Carmack Amendment applies to the inland leg of a multimodal shipment to a place in the United States from a place in a territory of the United States even if the inland carrier does not issue a separate bill of lading for the inland leg. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 10:43 pm
I recommend to the people I know in the Apple fan community who would like to see draconian remedies imposed on Samsung for Apple's competitive gain beyond what is warranted by its inventive contributions to the state of the art (I just borrowed language from a Federal Circuit ruling recently quoted by Judge Koh in Apple v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:13 am
Fortunately for Apple, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, while aware of what the media reported, will (have to) rule on a different basis.I don't disagree with Apple philosophically. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 9:02 am
Individuals in the United States have several options when it comes to getting their annual flu shots. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:16 pm
More importantly, it was reportedly frustration with the British resolution of 1785 authorizing the Department of Foreign Affairs to open and inspect any mail related to the safety and interests of the United States that led James Madison, Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe to write to each other in code.In fact, in the 1999 decision throwing out the government’s export regulations on encryption in EFF’s case Bernstein v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 6:29 am
Corruption swirled around the highest levels of the United States and of China. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:20 pm
Jane wrote an amicus brief in IMS v. [read post]
