Search for: "Superior Court of California" Results 3741 - 3760 of 10,169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2022, 12:43 pm
McAdam of the Yolo County Superior Court will be sitting in pro tempore beginning January 1, 2023. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Amy Howe
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:42 pm
., Cal.App.4th; 10 C.D.O.S. 10399, the California Court of Appeal, First District, recently affirmed a judgment entered in the San Francisco Superior Court against an insurer after a bench trial finding bad faith and punitive damages. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm by Greg Mersol
On March 10, 2010, the Superior Court for Los Angeles County, California certified a class of 13,000 employees in a series of consolidated cases asserting California rest and meal period claims against global security giant Wackenhut. [read post]
22 May 2023, 11:45 am
The Recorder has Newsom Nominates 3 More Appellate Justices, 27 Trial Court Judges -- The California governor's superior court selections include many lawyers with a background in criminal law.The DJ has Newsom nominates 3 to courts of appeal, names 27 trial judges -- Justice Brian Currey was nominated to serve as presiding justice of the 2nd District Court of Appeal, Division 4, where he has been an associate justice… [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:17 pm by Aaron Morris
Some plaintiffs attorneys received a huge pay cut today, after the California Court of Appeal reversed an $105 million judgment against Starbucks. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 1:00 am
The Superior Court of San Joaquin County (Angelo Dairy) (Supreme Court case no. [read post]
CGC16550128 (California Superior Court, County of San Francisco)—which included $250 million in punitive damages—was just the first in the nearly 8,000 Roundup-related cases currently pending against Monsanto, many of which are consolidated in multidistrict litigation in California federal court. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:26 am
Rex Heeseman, a Los Angeles County superior court judge, frequently writes op-eds on punitive damages for the Los Angeles & San Francisco Daily Journal. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
E060038), the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the Riverside County Superior Court’s judgment denying a petition for a writ of mandate challenging an EIR for the Perris Dam Remediation Project. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:37 am
Marital privilege not available in administrative disciplinary actions taken against law enforcement personnelRiverside County Sheriff's Department v Astrid Megan Reynolds, Court of Appeal [California], 4th District, Division 2, Docket #E043187Astrid Megan Reynolds served as a deputy sheriff with the Riverside County [California] Sheriff’s Department. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 1:07 pm by Amy Howe
Superior Court of California, which began as a lawsuit alleging that the plaintiffs had suffered severe side effects from Plavix, a prescription drug manufactured by Bristol-Myers to prevent blood clots. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:14 am by by PritzkerLaw
In the midst of last year's inspection of the company, authorities ensured a shutdown of operations by filing a stipulated preliminary injunction against Union International in Alameda County Superior Court. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 2:11 pm by Naomi Gilens
This case arose from the grossly disproportionate volume of wiretaps issued by the Riverside County Superior Court in 2014 and 2015. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Superior Court, 36 Cal. 4th 944 (2005), the California Supreme Court held under the Constitution the legislature must prescribe the methods of waiving a jury trial and  that Section 631 does not authorize pre-dispute waiver of that right. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
In this case the California Supreme Court concluded that a judge could decline to appoint a referee if there is a possibility of conflicting rulings on a common issue of law or fact. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:51 pm by Brad Pauley
Superior Court (Hohnbaum), S166350:  This fully briefed employment case presents the question whether an employer must simply “provide” meal breaks to its hourly employees or must “ensure” that those employees take their breaks. [read post]