Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 4,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
and (5) what "decision" or "decisions" can be challenged through gateway (b) (that is, just the decision to serve the notice to quit [ntq] or all decisions leading to possession - this is the ongoing battle between two lines of CA judgment, respectively Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146and Central Bedfordshire DC v Taylor [2009] EWCA Civ 613, discussed also in our note of Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA 51). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
and (5) what "decision" or "decisions" can be challenged through gateway (b) (that is, just the decision to serve the notice to quit [ntq] or all decisions leading to possession - this is the ongoing battle between two lines of CA judgment, respectively Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146and Central Bedfordshire DC v Taylor [2009] EWCA Civ 613, discussed also in our note of Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA 51). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 2:03 pm
Citing the Florida District Court of Appeals decision in Taylor v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:24 pm
See, e.g., Estrada-Espinoza v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:16 pm
Taylor was subsequently terminated from his position for sleeping on the job. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 12:29 pm
Varnum v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 11:21 am
The Supreme Court had announced that right in Taylor v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:18 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Davis v R [2010] EWCA Crim 708 (31 March 2010) Greaves & Ors v R [2010] EWCA Crim 709 (31 March 2010) Delucca, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 710 (31 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Valentines Homes & Construction Ltd, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 345 (31 March 2010) Servier Laboratories Ltd v National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence & Anor [2010] EWCA… [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm
City of Taylor, Case No. 138323. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:13 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:52 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:13 am
Taylor and Donaldson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:41 am
In addition, Civil Service Law Section 209-a.6, a subdivision that is part of the Taylor Law, provides that “In applying this section, fundamental distinctions between private and public employment shall be recognized, and no body of federal or state law applicable wholly or in part to private employment, shall be regarded as binding or controlling precedent. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:53 am
Image via WikipediaIn Central Kentucky News-Journal v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 9:45 am
Avis Rent A Car Systems (Court of Appeals 2002) Taylor v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 4:08 am
Employee terminated after being found guilty of misconduct following his conviction of crimes deemed to reflect unfavorably upon employee’s characterMatter of Taylor v City of Glen Cove, 2010 NY Slip Op 02157, Decided on March 16, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentArnold Taylor, a Supervisor of Sanitation in the Department of Public Works of the City of Glen Cove, pleaded guilty to the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, a… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:39 am
But a racially segregated prom — in this day and age, over 50 years after Brown v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
But we have travelled some distance since Fry J's restrictive probanda were uttered (Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Ltd [1982] 1 QB 133, of course, being the most pertinent authority, but others are cited), and Patten LJ said that the court was able "to take a flexible and very fact-specific approach to each case in which estoppel by acquiescence is relied upon" (at [39]). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
But we have travelled some distance since Fry J's restrictive probanda were uttered (Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Ltd [1982] 1 QB 133, of course, being the most pertinent authority, but others are cited), and Patten LJ said that the court was able "to take a flexible and very fact-specific approach to each case in which estoppel by acquiescence is relied upon" (at [39]). [read post]
