Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 6,171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2013, 5:37 am
In Avila v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:42 pm
However, the parties will have to await the decision in the Actavis v Sanofi reference before they can see what the future of their case looks like. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
In the case at bar, the Family Court's determination that the child's best interests would be served by awarding sole custody to the father has a sound and substantial basis in the record as was held in analogous cases of Matter of Peoples v Bideau, Pierre–Paul v Boursiquot, Matter of Ramirez v Velez and Matter of Paul v Sawyer. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 7:17 am
A search engine is good to answer a question like, “How many people live in China? [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
United States. 379 U.S. 241 (1964) (commerce power could be used to apply an anti-discrimination statute to an establishment that served people in interstate travel and that could affect national policy); Katzenbach v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:22 pm
(See, e.g., ACLU v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
Cross-posted from The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:46 am
For an example of how publication of a copyrighted work might "complete" a website's contract with a teen, see the 2008 AV v. iParadigms case. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:32 am
In Hastings v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 4:07 pm
In the decision particularly it is set forth that the business activities of Intel Corporation and our company do not cross paths. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
[Cross-posted at the Marquette University Law Faculty Blog.] [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
[Cross-posted at Madisonian.net.] [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:37 am
Buono (2010), the Mojave Desert cross case? [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm
A woman v Hemel Hempstead Gazette, 10.9.13. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm
In the case at bar, the criminal court assumes the most stringent standard in People v Vilardi, that is, the “reasonable possibility” standard to apply. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:07 pm
In People v Settles, it was held that this is impermissible. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 3:46 pm
The last requirement is known as the prima facie case requirement as held in People v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:15 pm
The Court of Appeal cite with approval what was said in Strasbourg in YC v United Kingdom (2012) 55 EHRR 967, para 134: ‘Family ties may only be severed in very exceptional circumstances and .. everything must be done to preserve personal relations and, where appropriate, to ‘rebuild’ the family. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:46 pm
The indictment could simply allege that the defendant committed the underlying crime in whole or substantial part because of a belief or perception of the race, or sex, or sexual orientation, or whatever of a person in accordance with People v McDowd. [read post]
