Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 14,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
Yesterday, in Kaley v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
This title phrase, glommed from the non-precedential decision of the Third Circuit in State Troopers v. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 5:51 pm
A second case in the Court’s new term — which officially opens on Monday, October 3 — also places free and fair elections in the United States in grave peril. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 12:29 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
In closely watched arguments at the U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:28 pm
Wisconsin State Legislature, 592 U. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 5:47 am
” Myrick v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 7:58 am
In the case, Porter v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:46 pm
Mass. and prohibiting webcasting) (.pdf) Public Notice Regarding the Local Rules of the United States District Court for [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
v=%CE%B1&r=04833355782549953; R. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
United States, which concerned whether presidents have criminal "immunity" for their official acts while in office. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 5:02 am
But a Supreme Court decision in 1969, Powell v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 10:11 am
Medellin was born in Mexico, he lived most of his life in the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
Yet, over a century later, Justice Scalia in Arizona v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:10 pm
The most closely-watched case of the week was U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:57 am
The situation in this case was to be distinguished from the one obtaining in Alconbury Developments Ltd, Re (2003) 2 AC 295 and R (on the application of Holding & Barnes Plc) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2001) UKHL 23, (2003) 2 AC 295, and Bryan v United Kingdom (1995) 21 EHRR 342. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
The IP captioning requirements apply only to programming that has been “published or exhibited on television in the United States”. [read post]
