Search for: "United States v. Fields"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 5,961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The state and the Park District jointly prepared the Eastshore State Park General Plan. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 10:36 am
The case of Sisson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 8:58 am
G2/98 does not state at all that one should literally claim “gold or a noble metal not being gold”, as some authors suggest. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 6:29 am
Current court challenges to the constitutionality of state DBE programs reflect this: Geyer Signal v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
Compaq Computer the Federal Circuit affirmed in part the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruling that Compaq Computer Corp., Seagate Technology, LLC., and Seagate Technology, Inc. did not misappropriate 11 of 15 alleged trade secrets from Convolve, Inc. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
Thirty-five years ago the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the context of higher education a state university that uses race as one of its admissions criteria must show that the use is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest." [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
Thirty-five years ago the Supreme Court of the United States held that in the context of higher education a state university that uses race as one of its admissions criteria must show that the use is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
Moreover, in Sutton v United Airlines, Inc, the Supreme Court stated that “an employer is free to decide that physical characteristics or medical conditions that do not rise to the level of an impairment — such as one’s height, build, or singing voice — are preferable to others, just as it is free to decide that some limiting, but not substantially limiting, impairments make individuals less than ideally suited for a job. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:01 am
It is telling that the citations in the footnote to my quoted sentence were to a legal scholar that Justice Thomas also quoted in the same opinion that tends to agree with his view of federal power in Indian affairs, Sai Prakash, and to a Supreme Court opinion that Justice Thomas is rallying against, the lead opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 7:09 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:49 am
WCAB (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State Police) , 11 A.3d 48 (2011), the injured worker, Washington, was employed as a Field Trooper with the State Police. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 3:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:06 am
Roughly two and a half months later the United States Supreme Court in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:30 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:20 am
The author ends this Section by setting off the report drawn up by GI-ESCR on this case before the United Nations Human Rights Committee, and the notes addressed by the Committee to Germany (October 2012) in its Concluding Observation nº 16. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
This well-settled principle is common to the United States and India. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:05 am
First articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
The judges observed that the Hatch-Waxman Act appears to be very sensitive to antitrust concerns, and cited several cases (inter alia, United States v Singer Mfg. [read post]
