Search for: "United States v. Heard" Results 3741 - 3760 of 8,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
Ellie Wilson brings you the story.CJEU: "Flat-rate" reimbursement for legal fees must cover a significant part of the costs incurred by the successful party In Case C-57/15 United Video Properties, the CJEU held that while Article 14 Enforcement Directive does not prohibit flat-rate reimbursement of legal costs per se, it sets limits on how Member States can set the flat-rate. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:53 am by Andrew Weissmann
United States  suffers from shallow reasoning, lack of historical support, and distortion of legal precedent. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 10:42 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
United States, No. 200700143, 2018 CCA LEXIS 87, at *1-2 (N-M Ct. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n (NYSR&P) v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n (NYSR&P) v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am by Neil Kinkopf
United States: The power of the Congress to conduct investigations is inherent in the legislative process. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:46 pm by Orin Kerr
I suspect Supreme Court review is a serious possibility.The new decision holds that the plaintiffs have established Article III standing to challenge Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which creates new procedures for authorizing government electronic surveillance targeting non-United States persons outside the United States for purposes of collecting foreign intelligence. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 8:01 am
On Monday, the Court heard argument in EC Term of Years Trust v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:07 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
 Section 105 of the Copyright Act precludes copyright protection for any work of the United States Government, but applies only to the federal government. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
On July 9, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit told the National Labor Relations Board’s to reconsider the standard for whether abusive or inappropriate speech is protected under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The judgement in Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department QB-2020-002120 was published this week. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Marvin Kirsner
Porpoise Evans Currently before the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 5:47 am
[They] have commenced tens of thousands of actions in the District Courts of the United States in the past five years, the overwhelming majority of which have resulted either in default judgments or extortionate settlements far in excess of any actual damages incurred by Counter-Defendants... [read post]