Search for: "United States v. Stevens"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 4,055
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2008, 12:18 pm
The clause states that “[t]he United States District Court for the District of Oregon may enter judgment upon any award, either by confirming the award or by vacating, modifying or correcting the award. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Weisman, Partner;former Managing Partner, China offices, Baker & McKenzie Mark Kirsch, Chair of Global Litigation and Dispute Resolution, Clifford Chance Stephen Denyer, International Development Partner, Allen & Overy Andrew Grech, Managing Director, Slater & Gordon Steven Mark, Legal Services Commissioner, New South Wales, Australia Osama Rahman, Ministry of Justice, United Kingdom Yours Truly … [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:18 pm
The defendant in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:48 pm
Executions in the United States had been on hold since last September, when the Court decided to take on the case of Baze v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 9:40 am
United States Dist. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:09 am
His renunciation of capital punishment in the lethal injection case, Baze v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 12:18 pm
United States (PDF), Justice Scalia once again sided with the criminal. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 12:18 pm
United States (PDF), Justice Scalia once again sided with the criminal. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:22 am
United States (06-11543) is now available here. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
United States (06-11543) is now available here. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:00 am
. ____ (2008) STEVENS, J., concurring in judgment SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 07-5439 RALPH BAZE AND THOMAS C. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:26 am
United States (06-11543) is now available here. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:28 am
Forty-four years have passed since any criminal in the United States was executed for a crime in which the victim was not killed. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 9:56 am
LINKJust because the United States agreed to take international disputes before the World Court doesn't mean that the nation automatically has to follow its rulings. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 6:57 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:29 am
"Just as foreigners should respect the letter of the law in this country, the United States should abide by its treaty obligations - not just at the federal level, but in state and local jurisdictions as well. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 9:16 am
Geren (06-1666) and Geren v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 5:37 am
Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
Yesterday saw five of the most conservative of the Supreme Court justices refusing to require a state court system (in Texas) to let an International Court of Justice ruling cause Texas to deviate from its law that does not permit more than one state-level habeas corpus proceeding. blank">Medellin v. [read post]
