Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 6,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Because four of those states will have Democratic governors, there is no way that enough states could be rigged in advance by Republican-controlled governments to overturn the will of the voters. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Smartly, Eisenhower maintained the New Deal policies and supported civil rights, including the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Draper’s measure is put before the voters. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:14 am
Before he ever took his first law class, he served as his own lawyer, filing the original complaint in what is now called Shapiro v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:07 am
It is ironic that MacLean falsely accuses of James Buchanan and other libertarians of opposing Brown v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Board overruled Plessy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:35 am
(AP Photo/Susan Walsh) Earlier this morning, the Supreme Court chose to hear Fisher v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:16 am
In Sutton v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 1:01 am
In Muhammed Afzal v Ayoub Khan & Ors [2023] EWHC 376 (KB), His Honour Judge Foster, sitting as election commissioner, was ruling on a petition by Labour candidate Muhammed Afzal to overturn the result of a local election in Birmingham in May 2022. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:06 pm
Is this part of making the decision more acceptable to Oklahoma voters? [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:48 am
One v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:16 am
In Sutton v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:16 am
In Sutton v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
A policy decision by the employer is not subject to "pre-negotiations;" the impact of that decision on unit members is negotiableMatter of County of Erie & Erie County Sheriff v State of New York Pub. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:20 am
Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 9:49 am
The case is styled Perry v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
For a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: 310 E. 23rd LLC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
Sánchez de Lozada and Mamani, et al. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:03 pm
City of Lake Forest v. [read post]
