Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2014, 4:30 am
But you just know that we’re about to tease such a principle out of a statute of limitations case, don’t you? [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 1:10 am
In the interim, note that Saeteurn just holds that a district court can avoid resolving disputed PSR facts if these facts don't affect sentencing. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:42 pm
I may not share Kerik's politics, but as I've read through the pleadings the past few years, I still don't get what the big fuss is all about. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:07 pm
The final text must resolve that ambiguity by carving out a clear safe-harbor for users, and ensure that there’s a consistent set of Europe-wide exceptions and limitations to news media’s new pseudo-copyright that ensure they don’t overreach with their power. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:07 am
It's only wrong that every federal judge doesn't give the same meaningful consideration to every defendant before him for sentencing. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
The Florida-based defendant was ordered to pay the defendant company $150,000 - the maximum that could be awarded as copyright infringement damages. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 4:09 pm
We're getting there. [read post]
15 May 2009, 8:21 am
I don't fully understand why the same group of class action lawyers would file two separate class action complaints covering the same basic defendants and issues, but it's not the first time we've seen this tactic (the advertisers suing Yahoo over "syndication fraud" pulled the same stunt). [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:26 pm
I can't do justice to Judge Elrod's extensive dissent here. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:37 am
They often don't. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 8:54 am
Indeed, I don't know how an informed debate is possible without pretty clear answers.1. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:04 pm
The former don't get it and the latter (for the most part) either haven't gotten it or refuse to turn such classically judicial questions over to "mere math". [read post]
27 Nov 2008, 6:23 am
We don't pay judges to dodge hard questions, or ask a jury to do his dirty work.So Judge Wu reserved decision. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
”That instruction relates to the “felony-murder rule,” which generally allows a court to hold a defendant responsible for a murder that occurs during the commission of a crime, even if the defendant didn’t commit the killing.Carol remembers thinking at the time that the instruction was unfair, but because she believed it was her duty to follow the judge’s guidance, she voted guilty. [read post]
13 May 2025, 12:12 pm
They know who they are, and don't need further notoriety here.} [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:43 am
What happens if they don't? [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:18 am
Fair uses don’t. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
I figure trade marks are a gift and I don't intend on wasting it"Leo Titanic Belfast may have saidDid Titanic Spa infringe? [read post]
13 May 2010, 5:02 am
Given that we just saw the State blow $120k on dubious "expert" anti-gay adoption testimony, I don't want to overstate anything.But is it too much to suggest that the State's furious scorched earth litigation strategy in defending the citrus canker lawsuits -- paying Adorno & Yoss hundreds of thousands of dollars (millions?) [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:57 am
I don't believe all of those plaintiffs realized some value from it -- the mere fact that a claim has not yet been dismissed doesn't necessarily mean the defendant sees a reasonable chance of it succeeding -- but the sheer size of that figure (almost four in five!) [read post]
