Search for: "Young v. State"
Results 3741 - 3760
of 8,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2011, 3:24 pm
The first case, Gauer v France, relates to the sterilisation of young women with disabilities, and the second case, RP v UK, concerns the removal of a child with physical disabilities from the care of its mother (a young woman with intellectual disability) without her consent to the adoption of the child. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:02 pm
In Roe v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:33 am
In other action, the board: Heard a report from outside counsel on the McDonald v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Beale v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:34 am
Young (13-95), with Justice Samuel A. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:15 pm
The federal court jury awarded $10,200,000 awarded two years ago (on July 18, 2022) after a crew member raped the young passenger on the Carnival Miracle. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:51 am
(Which is what happened a few years back in State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm
Wills), Financial Rescue LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:22 am
"); United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 12:30 pm
To recap briefly, Grant was a young black male who aroused the suspicions of some police by staring at them and “fidgeting”. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 6:47 am
In her article, Professor Mullenix discusses the far-reaching effect of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
United States CNN reports that a settlement has been reached in a defamation case against Bill Cosby — but representatives for the comedian say he didn’t cut the deal. [read post]
24 Sep 2016, 5:43 am
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:03 pm
Ernst & Young U.S., 441 N.J. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:18 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 10:31 am
Additional Resources: Gardner v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:32 am
The case is PP v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:58 am
The District Court Judge then explained that “Wolff challenges both the government's initial acquisition of his electronic devices and the lawfulness of the two state warrants that the government obtained to search them. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
