Search for: "Young v. State" Results 3741 - 3760 of 8,010
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2010, 5:55 am by Steve Kalar
It does to Judge Kleinfeld (left) in a new categorical analysis decision, United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch has hired Tobi Young, a Native American lawyer, to be one of his law clerks starting this summer. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 12:44 pm by Andrew Hamm
To the 3rd Circuit, the compact did not amount to federal law such that the doctrine of Ex parte Young, which allows federal courts to enjoin state officials from taking actions that allegedly violate federal law, did not apply. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:58 pm by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
”   According to the Order, such waivers would be appropriate “in circumstances such as the following”: (i)    the foreign national has previously been admitted to the United States for a continuous period of work, study, or other long-term activity, is outside the United States on the effective date of this order, seeks to reenter the United States to resume that activity, and the denial of reentry during the suspension period would… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:42 am by The Injustice Must End (TIME) Committee
Supreme Court will decide whether other young people get that same chance.On Nov. 9, the court will hold oral argument in Sullivan v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:53 am by crush
Blacksher spoke about the Constitutional implications of the Shelby Country v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 5:52 am
(Columbia University), on Wednesday, January 6, 2021 Tags: Anti-corruption, Corporate crime, FCPA, Incentives, Management, Misconduct, Non-prosecution agreement, Securities enforcement, Whistleblowers Another Year of Virtual Shareholder Meetings Posted by Brian V. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The fourth was also introduced last year, in Yenovkian v. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 1:03 pm by Giles Peaker
Enfield have not fallen foul of the principles enunciated by Lord Dyson in R(Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2012) 1 AC 245. [read post]