Search for: "Borders v. Borders"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 6,660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
The need for greater legal certainty to enable researchers and educational institutions to make wider use of copyright-protected material, including across borders, so that they can benefit from the potential of these technologies and from cross-border collaboration will be assessed, as with all parts of the copyright proposals in the light of its impact on all interested parties. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:57 pm
Would the Republicans tolerate a pluralist democracy on its northern border, or would they "liberate" Canada from its sinful ways? [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 8:12 am
Slide, Slide . . .Perron v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:08 pm
Auto Part Network, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 12:05 pm
Federal agencies regularly exercise their authority and wield technology to disproportionately and wrongly surveil, investigate, watchlist, question, and detain at the border, and deny immigration benefits to vulnerable communities. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm
Border Foods, Inc., 2019 WL 722753, at *4 (D. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
It is difficult to see any logic in treating an applicant less favourably because he takes the sensible course of applying for entry clearance from abroad, rather than simply arriving at border control at Heathrow. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2024, 10:00 am
IndiaMoitra v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
From Reynolds v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
Lopez, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 8:21 am
See Ornelas et al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 1:00 am
Citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Zauderer v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
The extent to which legal scrutiny borders on factual and artistic interpretation is certainly an interesting feature of the appeal judgment. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:56 am
InteriorSideFrontThe Defendants accepted that five features of the claimant's "eXtreme locker" were original: (i) the overall dimensions and proportions; (ii) the shape and dimensions of the raised section on the top; (iii) the shape and dimensions of the ribs at the side; (iv) the shape of the border and inset squares at the rear; and (v) the shape and dimensions of the inset sections at the base. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judges [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
/Mexico border. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Nixon v. [read post]
