Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 34,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2015, 4:20 am
Supreme Court yesterday denied certiorari in Center for Competitive Politics v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 2:52 pm
House (Public Law 280) U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 11:02 am
Bridges (McGirt v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 3:07 pm
The court noted that under State Farm, and under the California Supreme Court's own opinion in Simon v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:36 pm
So California law generally determines the circumstances under which a state court judgment is accepted by the bankruptcy court. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm
(Tribal Law; Appelate Rules) Furman v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:21 am
In 2008, the California Supreme Court held in Ross v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:34 am
A substantial body of state law serves to protect California consumers from the dangers posed by false, misleading, and inadequate labeling of prescription medications. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:44 am
Peña v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:27 am
Legacy Partners, another California court followed the lead of the recent decision in Iskanian v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:04 am
The California Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm
Further, even after recreational marijuana was legalized in the state in 2016, a 2018 California Supreme court ruling in Ross v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 12:07 pm
Thus, in Dodge v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 6:51 pm
A snippet of the latter, including the final paragraph:"California law is far from settled. . . . [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 11:28 am
Laroe Estates, Inc. and California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:15 am
Pepper, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:36 am
California case in which the power under California law to search all parolees without any suspicion by all peace officers (both parole and police) was upheld against a 4th Amendment challenge. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:41 am
In Moneycat Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:43 am
California State Law Trade Name Infringement Claim“Sega claims that Sherman is liable for California trade name infringement under Cal. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:15 am
Therefore, the defendants must demonstrate that litigating in the Delaware Court of Chancery would not substantially diminish rights under California law. [read post]
