Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 3761 - 3780 of 8,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2017, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   The June 20, 2017 Opinion On June 20, 2017, in an opinion by Judge Jeffrey Sutton for a 2-1 majority (Judge Bernice Donald dissenting), the Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling that the policy’s insured vs. insured opinion precluded coverage for the Liquidation Trustee’s claims against the Reids. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:53 am by Steve Vladeck
But Justice Kennedy, as one of its staunchest defenders, seems oblivious to its impact. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:14 am by Joy Waltemath
While the parties agreed that the 20-employee minimum applies to “a person engaged in an industry affecting commerce” and that the term “person” does not include a political subdivision of a state, they disputed whether the 20-employee minimum also applies to a “political subdivision of a State. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 1:15 pm by Stephanie M. Batchelder
  In the Supreme Court’s June 19, 2017 opinion, it reversed the California Supreme Court by a vote of 8-1. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:03 am by David Mooers-Putzer
The CLA does not confer rulemaking authority on the FTC. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 5:42 am by Florian Mueller
Contrary to popular misbelief, it was never about "only" $1 billion but always had implications and ramifications to the tune of many billions. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:22 pm by John Floyd
Under this statute, the State must prove: 1) defendant neglected their reasonable duty to prevent a death; 2) the defendant’s action directly caused a death; and 3) the defendant was aware of the risk created by their actions. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 2:02 pm by Robert L. Abell
The Court also upheld admission of testimony from defendant’s daughter concerning his sexual assault on her more than 20 years prior to the trial pursuant to FRE 414.Robert L.AbellZach Turpin  [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:49 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  Lawyers often refer to a defendant without insurance or any assets as being judgement proof, because, even if you win, you cannot collect what the defendant does not have. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists After spending the better part of two terms in a holding pattern because they were down a justice and at risk of 4-4 splits, the court is back at full strength and next term is shaping up nicely. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:50 am by Aurora Barnes
Maryland does not apply to impeachment evidence when the Supreme Court has held that Brady does apply to impeachment evidence. [read post]
  The Second Circuit reasoned that “the existence of an ongoing business plan to develop the Haynesville Shale does not exempt the defendants from [the production in paying quantities] requirement. [read post]
  The Second Circuit reasoned that “the existence of an ongoing business plan to develop the Haynesville Shale does not exempt the defendants from [the production in paying quantities] requirement. [read post]
  The Second Circuit reasoned that “the existence of an ongoing business plan to develop the Haynesville Shale does not exempt the defendants from [the production in paying quantities] requirement. [read post]