Search for: "Does 1 - 33"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 6,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
”1 Deciding whether something is a privilege based on our own subjective view as to whether the thing is “honorable” strikes me as an imprecise and inconsistent way to classify things. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:16 pm
Groundbreaking, innovative, or even brilliant discovery does not by itself satisfy the §101 inquiry. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
However, that of course does not make it acceptable. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:10 pm
60% ask for willful damages, and 1% get them. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm
” CLS Bank Int'l, at *24 (emphasis added).Inquiries[Inquiry 1]: Statutory Class"Claim 33 plainly recites a process. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 12:49 pm
The City, which already imposes a surtax of 1% on transactions inside city limits, tacked on an additional 1% as a “temporary” sales tax boost in 2009 to plug holes in the school budget. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:30 am
In addition, he noted that a job that does not require English proficiency, and an employer that accommodates both Spanish and Vietnamese speakers, is attractive to speakers of those languages. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:29 am
& Tech. 1, 81 (2000). [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 6:24 am
” See Indiana Code § 32-33-8-1. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:32 pm
NJSA 37:1-33 says: Whenever in any law, rule, regulation, judicial or administrative proceeding or otherwise, reference is made to “marriage,” “husband,” “wife,” “spouse,” “family,” “immediate family,” “dependent,” “next of kin,” “widow,” “widower,” “widowed” or another word which in a specific context denotes a marital or spousal relationship, the… [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 8:40 am
The case stems from a lawsuit filed by the Department of Justice and some 33 states that accused Apple of working with book publishers to artificially raise Ebook prices. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 2:59 pm
Disney is so obsessed with avoiding the topic of crime that it does not even use the word "crime" anywhere on its website. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
For this last week: Doe v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:12 pm
Code Regs., §§ 15301-15333 [listing 33 categorically exempt classes of projects]), the filing of the NOE here did not serve to trigger a 35-day limitations period to challenge the approval. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm
Lexis 1688, at *33-36. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
” See 33 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 4:01 pm
It is not a proper expert report for trial purposes because it does not fully set out the facts, observations or assumptions on which it was based. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:23 am
The fact that they sleep over only four nights does not matter. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm
In sum, because the 2007 and 2008 proceedings aimed to enforce only laws other than the Clean Water Act, § 1365(b)(1)(B) does not bar this action." [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
R 13(1) EPC 1973 was streamlined and its wording aligned with the revised EPC. [read post]
