Search for: "Does 1-39"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 5,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
The court found the jurisdiction to grant the order based on s. 39 of the Law and Equity Act. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
The growth of private markets through exempt offerings, the ascension of the once-mythical “unicorns,” and what these things portend for the future of our public markets have been hotly debated topics for some time now.[1] Over the past decades, private securities offerings have grown at a significantly faster rate than public offerings.[2] Companies that contemplate going public are now waiting much longer to do so.[3] Others are choosing not to go public at all.[4] Companies… [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 5:50 am
Tiffany O’Neil 1:40 Okay, I’ll answer that. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:00 am
He can and does convert B into A shares from time to time, but these are primarily held by outsiders. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 1:01 pm
On appeal, Murray contends: (1) the affidavit supporting the search warrant did not establish probable cause to search Murray’s Facebook account because it did not demonstrate the reliability of the informant or source of information; and (2) the evidence the trial court admitted from the Facebook account was not properly authenticated. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:41 am
Accordingly, unless there is binding authority to the contrary, I am of the view that, given the normal meaning of ‘commercial information’, the draftsman of section 72 intended confidential information of a commercial nature to be included in the definition of ‘intellectual property’” [39]. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:38 pm
The analysis centers political ideology and its formal expression through law, regulation, guidance, and operational supervision (theory does matter in this context, perhaps a lot). [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 7:22 pm
.,175 N.J. 309, 323 (2003), the Court held: "the ten-day provision does not preclude a continuance where fundamental fairness dictates allowing a defendant additional time. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
Title II does not create a right to information. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:48 am
We found that changes in 9-1-1 call rates could not explain the Chicago homicide spike. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[10] The court found that the MPPAA does not require it to grant the motions and permit the withdrawal liability claims to be arbitrated.[11] First, Judge Goldblatt analyzed the apparent conflict between the MPPAA and the Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:09 am
Age 30-39: +1, a former renter/ child becomes a homeowner Age 40-64: =0, sale of one implies purchase of another. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:50 am
Since the 1980s, statutory corporate income tax rates have declined significantly across the world and in OECD countries.[1] However, the average treatment of capital allowances has become worse since then, leading to broader tax bases that offset the benefits of lower statutory rates. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 8:47 pm
Hape indicated at para 39 that a legislature may violate international law if it does so expressly, it also indicated at para 52 that deference required by comity ends where clear violations of international law and fundamental human rights begins. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 5:48 am
Jerome Henderson won his case in a 2-1 vote,but Jeffrey Lundgren went before a different panel and lost 2-1.Lundgren was executed. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
Accordingly, unless there is binding authority to the contrary, I am of the view that, given the normal meaning of ‘commercial information’, the draftsman of section 72 intended confidential information of a commercial nature to be included in the definition of ‘intellectual property’” [39]. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
“But it's certainly going to help investors’ lawyers – there’s no question about that. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Affirmed.In Estate of Martha O'Neal, Therese Newkirk v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:27 pm
And Apple's SD card reader costs $39 on Amazon. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm
.'" ACLU executive director Steven Brown added: "The court's order requiring the removal of items from a website is a classic prior restraint that the First Amendment simply does not countenance. [read post]
