Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 6,456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2017, 8:20 am
In Water Splash v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 6:24 am
While a landmark 2016 Supreme Court decision, Birchfield v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 9:03 pm
In the case of Mink v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:36 pm
Gideon v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
On PatLit, Stefano Barazza's thoughtful post on the invalidation of a patent for lip and facial synchronisation of animated characters gives us an insight into life in the United States after Alice v CLS Bank revived the old-fashioned notion that patents are for inventive concepts and not for abstract ideas. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 12:01 pm
It is a tried and true metaphor, like its modern English counterpart -- between a rock and a hard place. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 5:44 am
Yet, their optional nature allows Member States to determine the actual shape and scope of any given resulting national exception. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:20 am
Of course, Kent is quite correct when he states that this attitude is not universal. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 8:54 am
” Relying on an English case, the court quoted C. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:16 am
He stated that the High Court judge had erred in determining that targeting “imports a notion of taking deliberate aim at a country. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 3:46 pm
The question before the justices in Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am
Evans v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:43 am
Thanks to Eugene for inviting me to post about some of the developments in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 12:38 pm
” – the English abstract reads as follows: Friedrich Carl v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:52 am
The style of the case is, Evanston Insurance Company v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 8:29 am
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
United States that Sheehan had a First Amendment right to continue publishing the classified material. [read post]
