Search for: "Fox v. Fox"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 5,078
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am
Siracusa v Sager 2011 NY Slip Op 32244(U);August 3, 2011;Supreme Court, Suffolk County; Docket Number: 06-35942; gives Judge: Peter Fox Cohalan the opportunity to review a many faceted matrimonial child support legal malpractice case. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:00 pm
The case cite is Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:20 pm
See State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 12:45 am
In a case on similar facts – Royal Life Estates(South) Ltd t/a Fox & Sons v Campbell – in 1993 the dismissal of a branch manager in a firm of estate agents who faced allegations of gross indecency – was held to be fair because it did not want to suffer damaging publicity. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:08 am
See Fox v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 5:54 am
Though FCC v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am
Denice Fox, a retired teacher, lived on Willada Lane in Glen Cove, Nassau County. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 12:32 am
Practice point: As a general rule, a defendant has no duty to control the conduct of third-parties.Student note: There is no bright-line rule in New York as to whether a mental health care provider treating a patient on a voluntary basis owes a duty of care to the general public.Case: Fox v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:55 pm
Fox, 917 S.W.2d 106, 110 (Tex. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:17 am
Kung Fox & Bill Hicks, D2002-0472 (WIPO July 25, 2002) . [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:15 am
Certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Matrimonial Lawyer and a Fellow of the American Academy of Matrimonial Attorneys, Eric practices in Fox Rothschild's Roseland, New Jersey office though he practices throughout New Jersey. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:51 am
Twentieth Century Fox vs British Telecom - The UK High Court recently found for the Motion Picture Association (MPA) in a landmark copyright case, Twentieth Century Fox v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:14 am
However, the District Court did acknowledge that the Supreme Court in Dastar Corp. v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp (2003) ( a subsection section (A) case) held that 'origin' refers to "the producer of the tangible goods that are offered for sale, and not the author of any idea, concept or communication embodied in those goods. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm
Today the Second Department issued an interesting decision in the case Fox v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:04 am
The editorial board of the New York Times discusses Douglas v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:14 pm
Fox v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:14 am
The rights, privileges and other property rights of a Major League Club hereunder and under any other Baseball-related agreement may be terminated (i) in the event of contraction, pursuant to Article V, Section 2 (b) (1), or (ii) involuntarily, with the approval of three-fourths of all Major League Clubs, if the Club in question shall do or suffer any of the following: (l) Make an assignment for the benefit of its creditors or file a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, or if a receiver… [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:21 am
Super. at 292-93 (allowing cross-examination), with Fox v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 2:48 am
That is, until I read L.J.V.H. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:23 am
Brooks v. [read post]
