Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 4,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Although many are familiar with the horrific eugenic practices in Nazi Germany, those ideas originated in the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:04 am
In the Optis v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:29 pm
In a series of case from about 2003, the ECtHR began to treat a person’s reputation as being capable of protection by Article 8 as part of the right to respect for private life: see, for example, Cumpana v Romania (2004) 41 EHRR 200 at [91], Chauvy v France (2004) 41 EHRR 610 at [70] and White v Sweden [2007] EMLR 1 at [21]. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 4:01 pm
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Peterson v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) referred from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v… [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:06 am
Buck v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:28 am
Kraftwerk v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
20 May 2023, 3:07 am
Yezhov and Others v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:41 am
See Weaver v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:20 am
In Germany one of these advertisements, displaying a pair of buttocks bearing the stamp “HIV positive” was banned by the authorities. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:59 am
Adams & Assoc., LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
It seems obvious that a news publisher would prefer to have a “reply and correction” system operated by a self-regulator rather than one operated by the courts as in countries such as Austria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain and Switzerland. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 4:42 am
The Pirate Party movement gained some momentum and managed to even get a few people elected to the European Parliament in Sweden and Germany. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 6:45 am
United StatesJordahl v. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 2:15 am
This follows a similar decision by the same Local Division in Dyson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:05 am
GermanyUser v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:41 am
” See Weaver v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:54 am
“the decisive factor in balancing the protection of private life against freedom of expression should lie in the contribution that the published photos and articles make to a debate of general interest” (following Von Hannover v Germany (2004) 40 EHRR 1, at para 76). [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
