Search for: "Gooding v. United States"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 21,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2014, 11:21 pm
"The real-world evidence included, among other things, license deals such as the Apple-HTC settlement and Apple's own 60-cents-per-unit damages claim in the "Posner case" (Apple v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:29 am
United States is a case about the classification of used clothing coming into the United States.The plaintiff imported bales of used clothing and classified the merchandise in HTSUS item 6309.00.00 as "worn clothing," which is a duty free. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 3:43 pm
E. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 4:34 pm
United States, which is a drawback case. [read post]
26 May 2014, 11:00 am
That opportunity dissolves if Customs seizes the merchandise before the case is brought before the United States Court of International Trade. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:47 am
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:44 am
Nothing in Title 17 of the United States Code even hints at that possibility. [read post]
Opinion analysis: Federal “use of force” encompasses reckless domestic violence misdemeanor offenses
27 Jun 2016, 6:08 pm
Two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
See Prestonettes, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:23 am
Lilly has sued Defendants over the sale of Panoramis to the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:07 am
To its credit, the Supreme Court took only three years to correct itself in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
As in Scheck v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 2:41 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm
United States – which was a product of the residual clause itself — has generated. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:01 am
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 10:23 pm
United States", 277 U.S. 438 (1928) ... [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 10:27 am
Supreme Court just explained in Commil United States, LLC v. [read post]
