Search for: "HILL v. STATE" Results 3761 - 3780 of 5,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Attorney for the State: Joby Jerrells, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Brenwick Associates, LLC v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:07 pm
His Honour Judge Hacon has referred to the CJEU two important questions of unregistered Community design (UCD) law.In Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Company v PMS International Group plc [2019] EWHC 2419 (IPEC), the Claimant (BHTB) seeks to enforce its registered Community designs, UCDs and copyright in design drawings in six soft toys called “Squeezamals” [which are seemingly very popular; readers with small children may be better placed to comment]. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 10:29 pm by Florian Mueller
They don't make the decision, but both the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) presiding over the investigation and, ultimately, the Commission (the U.S. trade agency's top-level decision-making body) often find the staff's input useful.Discovery disputes between private parties are normal--and it's equally normal that companies being investigated or sued by antitrust enforcers dispute the scope of discovery requests (I've been watching that for a while now in United… [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:06 pm by William Ford
Robert Loeb and Sarah Grant argued that the decision of the Eastern District of Virginia in Al Shimari, et. al. v. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am by Matthew Kahn
Covering travel ban litigation, Jane summarized the oral arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:30 am
On Capitol Hill and in state capitals nationwide, we further continue to press for passage of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act and state-level analogues, which would make clear to employers and judges alike that women shouldn’t have to sacrifice their paycheck for a safe pregnancy. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:30 pm by Anna Christensen
  And although the State contended that a ruling covering both misadvice and omission would lead to a “flood” of challenges of existing guilty pleas made by noncitizen defendants, the Court countered that a similar concern was raised in Hill v. [read post]