Search for: "High v State"
Results 3761 - 3780
of 35,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 8:24 am
The dispute in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 12:27 am
The full judgement can be accessed here: ABSA Bank Limited v Rosenburg and Another (1255/2022) [2024] ZASCA 58 (24 April 2024) (saflii.org) [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:29 am
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 12:56 pm
Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 4:12 am
In a recent decision in the case of High v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:28 am
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:50 pm
See Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
Plyler v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Yet Supreme Court cases—especially the 1991 ruling in Gregory v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
They submitted, in particular, that The company offered a service to the public, it had a right to trade, it was trading well in an area of high unemployment. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 10:03 am
The case, West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
As the Court said forcefully less than three years ago in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
Balasubramaniam, Department of Food Science and Technology at Ohio State University, who has been conducting HPP research since 1995, is quick to agree with Cargill officials that the company's "Fressure" hamburgers represent a technological breakthrough. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:30 am
New Judgment: Cape Intermediate Holdings Limited v Dring [2019] UKSC 38 On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 1795 This appeal considered the powers of the court pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules or its inherent jurisdiction to permit access to documents used in litigation to which the applicant was not a party. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:09 am
ML Genius v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 7:43 am
The Court found that Petitioner rationally hired an out-of-state law firm for her high stakes case, and her attorney’s rates were reasonable given their specialized practice, skill, experience and reputation. [read post]
