Search for: "Jackson, Appeal of" Results 3761 - 3780 of 4,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2011, 5:42 am by Jon Hyman
– from Rob Radcliff’s Smooth Transitions TRO Entered Where Owner Of Trade Secrets Made “Substantial” Efforts To Maintain Confidentiality – from Trading Secrets DOJ Pursues Antitrust Claims Against Companies That Agree With Competitors Not to Recruit One Another's Employees – from Trade Secrets and Noncompete Blog Presented by Kohrman Jackson & Krantz, with offices in Cleveland and Columbus. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:00 am by Kirk Jenkins
Late in the March term, the Illinois Supreme Court answered this question in Jackson-Hicks v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:53 am by Lawrence Cunningham
  It is an appeal to change the law in line with a particular ideological view of what law ought to be, not uphold law as it is. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
” A decision on Colorado could put this theory to rest by the sheer finality of the appeal. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 11:37 am by Neumann Law Group
California Appeals Court Reverses Ruling for Employer Following Employee’s Car Accident After Leaving Work, California Injury Lawyer Blog, September 20, 2016. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 11:12 am by Scott C. Idleman
Fox Television Stations, a case arising in 2010 out the Second Circuit Court of Appeals following a 2009 remand from the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 May 2009, 5:45 pm
The question presented was whether, as such, the New York law in question violates the Supremacy Clause (the New York Court of Appeals said no, albeit in a sharply divided 4-3 ruling).For the majority, Justice Stevens reversed, concluding that the New York law is not a neutral jurisdictional rule, and therefore violates the antidiscrimination principle set out in the Court's prior precedents (e.g., Testa v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm by Andrew Trask
The Committee would need to clarify whether any ruling concerning the certified issue would be an appealable final judgment under Rule 23(c)(3). [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
However the magistrate recommended that plaintiff be permitted to proceed on his claim that on one occasion, when he was entitled to it, he was denied a religious diet meal.In Jackson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:17 am by WSLL
  The district court granted summary judgment against him and in favor of Appellee, and Appellant appeals that ruling. [read post]