Search for: "John Doe 2" Results 3761 - 3780 of 13,834
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2019, 5:00 pm
By using a separate will for the closely held companies, there may be significant savings if the will does not need to be probated.The Application Judge’s decision and reasoning is succinctly summarized by Associate Chief Justice Marrocco:[1]               John Douglas Milne and Sheilah Marlyn Milne died on the same day. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 9:28 am by Eric Goldman
So either Andra should skip the pre-suit discovery proceeding altogether and just start with a John Doe lawsuit, or if the proceeding gets tied up in court, it should bring a separate John Doe lawsuit before the SOLs run out. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 3:00 am by Doug Cornelius
(Part I)When Is a Crypto Asset a “Security,” and Why Does That Matter? [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Everyone who uses a firewall does so prudently, and everyone using a password manager (rather than reuse the same password repeatedly) does so extra prudently. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
The transitional power would be used by the UK regulators for a period of up to 2 years from exit day. [read post]
Given the underlying facts of the case, if the appellant does lose then she may rightly feel a deep sense of injustice, whatever the law. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Given the underlying facts of the case, if the appellant does lose then she may rightly feel a deep sense of injustice, whatever the law. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Unger does not have much good to say about Congress, charging them with “incessant, often infantile backbiting that they euphemistically called congressional debate. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
[Starbucks' Section 2(f) claim based on five years of continuous and substantially exclusive use was not challenged].Green Circle Alone: Starbucks also sought registration of this mark under Section 2(f) (thereby conceding that the mark is not inherently distinctive), but this time the USPTO challenged that claim. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 2:54 pm by Karen T. Willitts, Esq.
Jan. 2, 2019) expressed some disagreement over how summarily a family court judge resolved a custody dispute between unmarried parents. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
It says Amendment 41 does not apply to “home rule cities or counties that have adopted charters, ordinance or resolutions that address the matters covered” under the amendment. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm by MOTP
Dec. 18, 2018) (motion for rehearing and for en banc filed Jan 2, 2019)  Not your typical scenario: Dispute over two competing bids to get into arbitration, one bilateral, the other encompassing all parties. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Charlie Dunlap
But Ortiz simply does not do the work that Maurer argues it does. [read post]