Search for: "John Doe C" Results 3761 - 3780 of 5,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2012, 2:50 am by John L. Welch
The Board therefore granted Petitioner's motion for summary judgment, cancelling the registration.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Of course, this does not settle the theoretical question. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am by Mandelman
  And Robb may think it going out on a limb, but I for one have complete confidence that the State of Arizona will be able to figure out what its own constitution does and does not allow. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:41 pm by lawmrh
See “Annual Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Conference | C-SPAN. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:53 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
In its interaction with other disciplines, how does law preserve its disciplinary identity? [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:17 am by INFORRM
pp. 199-210(12), Grey, Siobhan Does the Open Justice Principle Require Cameras to be Permitted in the Courtroom and the Broadcasting of Legal Proceedings? [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
John Doe, in this context, does not refer to a person; it is a legal proceeding. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 10:04 pm by Michael Geist
While Bill C-11 is far more restrictive than necessary to comply with the WIPO Internet treaties, it does include a mechanism to identify new exceptions. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:57 am by Ken Kersch
The Francis Schaeffer/C. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:31 am by Susan Brenner
Olson, 495 U.S. 91 (1990) (`[C]apacity to claim the protection of the 4th Amendmen [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 10:42 am by Terry Hart
Focusing on originality, quality over quantity, and publishing less while spending more time on writing — does work. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 11:10 am by WSLL
CiteID=465081Appeal from the District Court of Sheridan County, the Honorable John G. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Usually, when it comes down to defending claims in federal rather than state court, we’ll choose federal court.So what does Article III standing have to do with that? [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:46 am by Susan Brenner
It’s a matter of common sense and fairness.If hearsay weren’t excluded, John Doe could take the stand and say Jane Doe told him the defendant – Richard Roe – who’s on trial for murder confessed to the whole thing. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:45 am by John L. Welch
Petitioner raised five grounds for cancellation: that Respondent permits its marks to be used for purposes other than certification (Section 14(5)(C) of the Lanham Act); that respondent does not control use of its marks (Section 14(5)(A)); that respondent discriminates in refusing to certify (Section 14(5)(D)); that the marks are generic for the goods; and that respondent committed fraud on the USPTO in securing the registrations. [read post]