Search for: "King v. State" Results 3761 - 3780 of 5,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The departure from the American approach appears to have occurred as early as in 1875 in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 7:38 am by Hanlon Law, PA
It cited the state Supreme Court’s 2016 ruling in Norvil v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:39 am by Sean Gallagher
In a joint statement issued by the European Commission, Vice President for the Digital Single Market Andrus Ansip; Commissioner for Justice, Consumers, and Gender Equality Věra Jourová; Commissioner for the Security Union Julian King; and Commissioner for the Digital Economy and Society Mariya Gabriel wrote: [W]e need to see more progress on the commitments made by online platforms to fight disinformation. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Jeff Welty’s pithy explanation of the potential impact in North Carolina of the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:46 am
  FDA stated, "Because the Act addresses directly the question of forfeiture as a result of a settlement [in 21 USC 355(j)(5)(D)(i)(V)], the agency does not have the discretion to determine that settlements not otherwise meeting the statutory requirements also will result in forfeiture. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:34 am by Mariah
Check it out in the Good Reads section.The Supreme Court itself has weighed in on golf, in the 2001 case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reached the exact opposite conclusion in King v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(China Law Blog) ‘Class’ justice in trademark rights: Lan Kwai Fong (IP Dragon)   Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court: Unilever’s ice cream KING CONE did not infringe Danish trademark KING COOL (Class 46) New Danish rules on valuation of IP (Innovationpartners)   Europe CFI: Lange Uhren watch shape appeal dismissed: Lange Uhren GmbH v OHIM (Class 46) CFI: no similarity between "MANGO… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" The statute requires that a defendant challenging service move to dismiss on that ground (Daniels v King Chicken & Stuff, Inc., 35 AD3d 345 [2006]). [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
Oh yes — King v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 12:50 pm by Steve Gottlieb
It prohibits “accept[ing] any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or Foreign State. [read post]