Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 3761 - 3780 of 6,678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2014, 11:22 am by Giles Peaker
Then along came Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor (No 2) [2014] UKSC 46 on 23 July. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Since 2003, a third of the net new jobs created in the United States were in Texas. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:52 am by admin
First, whether § 51 applies to all state building codes or “only those concerning fire safety” as stated in McAllister v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 8:49 am by Andrew Crocker and Cindy Cohn
For example, we know that the government also conducts sweeping mass collection outside of the United States of both Americans' and foreigners' communications under Executive Order 12333, and it may well use this order and other authorities for mass collection in the U.S. and abroad. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 8:30 am by Nicholas Gebelt
Constitution contains the following provision: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof . . . shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in United States history. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am by Marty Lederman
  Take the religious objection to the federal minimum wage at issue in Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:34 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Courts of Appeals Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2014cta.htmlAlabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 11:09 am by Ben Rubin
Earlier this month, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed a lawsuit brought under section 9 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) because, instead of attacking a specific project or approval, the complaint and notice of intent generally attacked all land use permit decisions by the local agency. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:23 am by wmxadmin
The Supreme Court Rules Once and for all, the United States Supreme Court has finally ruled on the issue establishing the law of the land. [read post]