Search for: "Majors v. Majors" Results 3761 - 3780 of 55,409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2007, 8:07 pm
The California Supreme Court will deliver major rulings this summer.PRACHASAISORADEJ v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:30 am by Lawrence Solum
This Essay further argues that Ashcroft v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm by Steve Kalar
A slow week in the Ninth (for non-capital cases, at least), and an order amending the opinion, gives us an excuse to go back for a second pass at the interesting decision and sentencing issues in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:53 am
Sometimes I agree with neither the majority nor the dissent. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 10:31 am
  But sometimes a panel changes its mind.Judge Schroeder wrote a majority opinion last year in which she held that Vukmirovic's in absentia deportation should be reversed for "exceptional circumstances" -- namely, the fact that he was deported because he had changed addresses and thus wasn't notified of the renewed proceedings against him. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:07 am
  The majority opinion, written by Judge Kozinski, starts out by saying:"With fifteen strokes of his knife, Richard Leavitt slashed and stabbed Danette Elg to death in her bedroom. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:44 am by Danielle Citron
Thanks so much to Professor Neil Richards (who generously serves as our First Amendment guest expert) for his thoughts on Snyder v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:00 am by INFORRM
[Didn’t the ECtHR also noted in Delfi v Estonia that Delfi was one of the major Internet news portals in Estonia?] [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 21 November the Court of Appeal delivered a major decision on the statutory public interest defence for defamation claims, in the case of Alexander Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:24 pm
Make even harder by the fact that both the majority opinion (written by Judge Friedman, sitting by designation from the Federal Circuit, and joined by Judge Randy Smith) and the dissent (authored by Judge Betty Fletcher) make some pretty darn good points.On the one hand, I'm somewhat appalled that an attorney -- especially a potentially not-very-good one -- can take a hefty amount of attorney's fees from a client in a totally simple case. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
District Court for the District of Delaware's decision in Santarus, Inc. v. [read post]